Not a Subscriber? Register Now
California Could Become First State to Ban Homosexual Conversion Therapy for TeensMay 14, 2012 by Clay Duda
If passed, a California law will make it the first state in the nation to ban controversial therapy aimed at turning gay and lesbian teens straight.
State Sen. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance), sponsor of the bill, said the so-called reparative therapy wrongly treats homosexuality as a disease and can be harmful to minors.
“Some therapists are taking advantage of vulnerable people by pushing dangerous sexual orientation-change efforts,” Lieu told the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee last week. “These non-scientific efforts have led in some cases to patients later committing suicide, as well as severe mental and physical anguish.”
As it’s written, SB 1172 would ban juveniles under the age of 18 from undergoing “sexual orientation change efforts” (SOCE) and require adults considering treatment to sign consent forms stating they understand the therapy has no medical basis and the potential dangers.
The bill has already passed two Senate policy committees and is due for a vote on the Senate floor, liking within the next month. If passed, the bill goes on to face the state Assembly before becoming law.
Specific SOCE techniques vary, but may include visualization, behavioral and social skills training, and in extreme cases electroshock or drug-induced behavior modifications.
The American Psychological Association and several other professional organizations have established the position that homosexuality is not a diseases or mental illness, and therefore does not need a cure.
“Clearly, so-called conversion or reparative therapy is scientifically ineffective and has resulted in harm,” Lieu said in a release. “Simply put, this is an unacceptable therapeutic practice.”
According the Lieu, the bill is based on more than 40 years worth of scientific research, but some opponents contend the science behind the measure isn’t so straightforward.
“SB 1172 makes serious errors in its representation of both the issue of change in sexual orientation and in the likelihood of harm,” the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) said in a statement opposing the bill.
NARTH, a professional organization that “offers hope to those who struggle with unwanted homosexuality,” said the bill “presents the issues of change and harm in a partisan manner” and overly restricts parent’s rights in selecting psychological care for their children, among other critiques.
Lieu’s office told MSNBC that the overall response had been positive, but he had also been the recipient of a slew of hate mail.
Photo via Flickr Sam T (samm4mrox)
You must Login before leaving a comment.
Latest News Articles
Rebecca Stimmler | 04/15/15Chess Becoming Common Core’s Game of Choice... Read More
Stell Simonton | 04/10/14Focus on Girl Justice Leads to Girlvolution... Read More
Lisa Chiu | 04/09/14Who’s Getting OJJDP Grants … And Why... Read More
Gary Gately | 04/07/14LGBTQ Youths Detained for Status Offenses Twice as... Read More
Meral Agish | 04/02/14Big Easy Stories of LGBT Youth Light the Apple’s S... Read More
Gary Gately | 04/01/14Report Highlights Stark Racial Disparities Among U... Read More
Elly Yu | 03/31/14Fellowship Helps Recruit More Juvenile Justice Wor... Read More
Ed Finkel | 03/28/14Latino Program in Oakland Focuses on Cultural Acti... Read More
Latest Tweets From Youth Today
Are We There Yet? Toward More Gender and Culturally Responsive Work with Male Youth
Written by Jon Gilgoff | 04/14/2014
I’d like to correct a misconception that could hold back the much needed movement to empower male youth, and particularly boys and young men of color (BYMOC), toward more equitable outcomes. The idea is that before feminism catalyzed more gender-specific and gender-responsive spaces for females, youth serving schools and agencies were inherently designed to serve males’ needs.
The field is still identifying the unique needs and particular challenges of boys and young men, and how to design ...